Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57
Filtrar
1.
Rev. esp. med. legal ; 48(4): 136-143, Octubre - Diciembre 2022. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-213681

RESUMO

Introducción: la sobrestimación por los facultativos del riesgo a una demanda judicial tiene, entre otras consecuencias, la intensificación de la medicina defensiva. El objetivo del trabajo fue analizar las características de las sentencias sobre la responsabilidad médica en España en la asistencia sanitaria pública en las especialidades de cardiología y cirugía cardiovascular.Material y métodos: estudio observacional transversal cuyo objetivo fue analizar las sentencias dictadas en la jurisdicción contencioso-administrativa por los Tribunales Superiores de Justicia entre el período 2008-2020, en las especialidades de cardiología y cirugía cardiovascular. Las variables fueron administrativas, clínicas, judiciales e indemnizatorias.Resultados: se analizaron 1.015 sentencias, de las cuales 47 (4,63%) se refirieron a las especialidades de cardiología y cirugía cardiovascular. Ambas obtuvieron porcentajes de frecuencia similares, cardiología 22 (2,16%) y cirugía cardiovascular 25 (2,46%). El 74,1% de las sentencias fueron desestimatorias en primera instancia y el 75% en segunda instancia. Los 2 motivos de sentencia estimatoria más frecuentes fueron la pérdida de oportunidad 6 (42,85%) y la mala praxis diagnóstica y/o terapéutica 5 (35,71%). Los daños reclamados fueron: fallecimiento 21 (44,68%) y secuelas 26 (55,32%). La mediana de las indemnizaciones fue 30.000 euros.Conclusiones: la baja frecuencia de las demandas en cardiología y cirugía cardiovascular indica que se trata de especialidades de «bajo riesgo» de litigiosidad. La inmensa mayoría de las sentencias son, además, desestimatorias de la pretensión de los pacientes. Los datos contribuyen a estructurar el papel de las demandas judiciales y a aumentar el conocimiento de los profesionales en la dimensión médico-legal de la asistencia sanitaria. (AU)


Introduction: The overestimation by physicians of the risk of a lawsuit has, among other consequences, the stepped-up of defensive medicine. To analyze the characteristics of medical liability rulings in Spain in public health care in the specialties of cardiology and cardiovascular surgery.Materials and methods: Cross-sectional observational study analyzing the rulings handed down in the contentious-administrative jurisdiction by the High Courts of Justice in the period 2008-2020, in the specialties of cardiology and cardiovascular surgery. The variables were administrative, clinical, judicial, and compensatory.Results: A total of 1015 rulings were analyzed; 47 (4.63%) involved to the specialties of cardiology and cardiovascular surgery. Both obtained similar frequency percentages, cardiology 22 (2.2%) and cardiovascular surgery 25 (2.5 %). A total of 74.1 % of the rulings were dismissed in the first instance and 75% in the second instance. The two grounds for finding against the defendent were loss of chance 6 (42.85%) and diagnostic and/or therapeutic malpractice 5 (35.71%). Damages were usually claimed: death 21 (44.68%) and sequelae 26 (55.32%). The median award was 30,000 euros.Conclusions: The low frequency of claims in cardiology and cardiovascular surgery indicates that these are “low risk” specialties for litigation. The vast majority of the rulings are, moreover, dismissive of the patients' claims. The data help to structure the role of lawsuits and to increase professionals' knowledge of the medical-legal dimension of health care. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Cardiologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Cirurgia Torácica/ética , Cirurgia Torácica/legislação & jurisprudência , Cardiologia/ética , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Responsabilidade Legal , Estudos Transversais/legislação & jurisprudência , Espanha , Responsabilidade Social
2.
J Card Surg ; 34(9): 754-758, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31332830

RESUMO

Approximately 36 400 cardiac and 23 100 thoracic operations are carried out in the United Kingdom between 2006 and 2015. National Health Service (NHS) resolution, as known as the NHS litigation authority, is one of the essential bodies of the Department of Health. Its purpose is to provide NHS expertise to resolve concerns fair and square share learning for improvement. We aim to evaluate and increase awareness of medicolegal cases in cardiothoracic surgery. Total numbers and details of claims coded by NHS resolution in cardiothoracic surgery from 2004 to 2017 were requested under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The data provided in successful claims is further breakdown into damages paid to the claimant, defence cost, claimant cost paid and the sum of the three. In contrast, unsuccessful claims only include the defence cost. Moreover, data provided also includes further analysis of primary causes and primary injuries for Claims Closed/Settled with damages paid. There were 753 claims recorded from 2004 to 2017, of which 415 (55.11%) were successful. The number of claims has been steadily increasing since 2004, with two significant raises from 2009/10 to 2010/11 (37-55, 48.64% raise) and 2012/13 to 2013/14 (49-69, 40.82% raise). The mean successful claim ratio was 69.58% (range, 47.56%- 83.33%) There is also a steady increase in the successful ratio from 2004 to 2017. In summary, this is the first study published in relation to litigation claims on cardiothoracic surgery in the United Kingdom. The results have provided insight on claims made against cardiothoracic surgery.


Assuntos
Previsões , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Estatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Cirurgia Torácica/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medicina Estatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia Torácica/estatística & dados numéricos , Reino Unido
3.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes ; 4(4): 239-245, 2018 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30060178

RESUMO

Quality-of-care registries have been shown to improve quality of healthcare and should be facilitated and encouraged. The data of these registries are also very valuable for medical data research. While fully acknowledging the importance of re-using already available data for research purposes, there are concerns about how the applicable privacy legislation is dealt with. These concerns are also articulated in the new European law on privacy, the 'General Data Protection Regulation' (GDPR) which has come into force on 25 May 2018. The aim of this review is to examine what the implications of the new European data protection rules are for quality-of-care registries in Europe while providing examples of three quality-of-care registries in the field of cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery in Europe. A general overview of the European and national legal framework (relevant data protection and privacy legislation) applying to quality-of-care registries is provided. One of the main rules is that non-anonymous patient data may, in principle, not be used for research without the patient's informed consent. When patient data are solely and strictly used for quality control and improvement, this rule does not apply. None of the described registries (NHR, SWEDEHEART, and NICOR) currently ask specific informed consent of patients before using their data in the registry, but they do carry out medical data research. Application of the GDPR implies that personal data may only be used for medical data research after informing patients and obtaining their explicit consent.


Assuntos
Segurança Computacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Registros de Saúde Pessoal , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Privacidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Sistema de Registros , Cirurgia Torácica/legislação & jurisprudência , Europa (Continente) , Humanos
6.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 141(6): 892-5, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24838335

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The Blood Utilization Committee implemented a standardized protocol for the preoperative blood order for cardiac patients. The aim of our study was to assess the improvement in blood utilization using the crossmatch to transfusion ratio (C:T). METHODS: Four months of retrospective data were collected, which included all RBC crossmatch requests and all RBC units transfused. Similar data were gathered for the period of the intervention. The difference in C:T was calculated. RESULTS: The retrospective group had 166 patients for whom blood products were ordered. There were 560 crossmatch requests and 237 transfused RBC units with a C:T of 2.36. The prospective group had 127 patients with 297 crossmatch requests, 190 transfused units, and a C:T of 1.56. There was a statistically significant difference in the C:T. The cost difference was $12,244.00. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing exact guidelines, with the introduction of a type-and-screen concept, allowed more efficient blood usage.


Assuntos
Tipagem e Reações Cruzadas Sanguíneas/estatística & dados numéricos , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Bancos de Sangue , Tipagem e Reações Cruzadas Sanguíneas/economia , Transfusão de Sangue/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cirurgia Torácica/economia , Cirurgia Torácica/legislação & jurisprudência
11.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 49(5): 201-6, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23298823

RESUMO

The pharmaceutical industry contributes to the development of new drugs, provides funding for research and collaborates in continuing medical education. Although this relationship with medical practice is beneficial and desirable, commercial interests could potentially eclipse patient benefits and compromise professional integrity. Congresses and meetings of the Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) agglutinate different spheres of knowledge, including aspects such as bioethics, management and communication, always centered on patient and their well-being. SEPAR congresses and meetings should provide sufficient economic benefits to be reinvested in research and other purposes which are reflected in SEPAR statutes in order to ensure the solvency, sustainability and economic independence of the Society. SEPAR has developed strict regulations governing the sponsorship and accreditation of training activities while striving for a balance between the interests of the industry and its own necessary independence, which results from the constant concern for maintaining good medical practice and complying with ethical aspects. This regulation is useful from an organizational and logistical standpoint, and it is necessary to prevent or resolve any possible conflicts of interest. Scientific societies should regulate common practices that could potentially result in conflicts of interest.


Assuntos
Congressos como Assunto/ética , Pneumologia/organização & administração , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Cirurgia Torácica/organização & administração , Conflito de Interesses/legislação & jurisprudência , Congressos como Assunto/economia , Congressos como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Congressos como Assunto/normas , Organização do Financiamento , Fundações/economia , Guias como Assunto , Pneumologia/economia , Pneumologia/educação , Pneumologia/ética , Pneumologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Sociedades Médicas/economia , Sociedades Médicas/ética , Sociedades Médicas/legislação & jurisprudência , Espanha , Cirurgia Torácica/economia , Cirurgia Torácica/educação , Cirurgia Torácica/ética , Cirurgia Torácica/legislação & jurisprudência
12.
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 25(4): 280-6, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24673956

RESUMO

The Affordable Care Act legislation that was passed by the US Congress and signed into law by President Obama on March 23, 2010 is having a substantial effect throughout all of health care in the United States. Cardiothoracic surgeons, as hospital-based procedural specialists, bring unique assets and certain important liabilities into this massive restructuring of our health care delivery system. This article highlights how each of the 10 titles in the Obamacare legislation might affect our specialty; its collaborative relationship with our cardiovascular, medical specialty, and primary care colleagues; and our clinical practice roles and responsibilities in accountable care organizations and primary care medical homes. This article also addresses the unique assets in clinical data in medicine and quality improvement demonstrated by our specialty that have been used to help shape the current and future landscape. Finally, key resources are identified to allow the cardiothoracic community to monitor the ongoing progress of Obamacare as implementation begins. Keeping abreast of these rapidly changing developments will be an important role for our specialty societies and for practitioners alike going forward.


Assuntos
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/legislação & jurisprudência , Cirurgia Torácica/legislação & jurisprudência , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/legislação & jurisprudência , Redução de Custos , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Cirurgia Torácica/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos/economia , Estados Unidos
17.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 35(3): 480-8, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19168370

RESUMO

Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery are innovative specialties that regularly recruit the latest technological developments into their armoury of devices and equipment. The introduction of new technology is dependant on patents; an important but single component of intellectual property. Patents enable the attribution of rights to concepts, ideas and inventions and this facilitates ownership, subsequent licensing and overall management of innovation and its outcome. It is not just thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, but the healthcare world in general that experiences ongoing technological evolution; so to remain contemporary, it is important that those in positions of responsibility are familiar with the relevant processes. This requires basic medico-legal knowledge and may be entwined with significant financial responsibility. Penetrating clinical, academic and industrial environments, informed awareness of patents also contributes to important leadership skills, encouraging the incorporation of innovation into the professional milieu. We aim to present through this manuscript an overview of these issues in order to promote awareness of patents within thoracic and cardiovascular surgery using a descriptive and practical approach.


Assuntos
Licenciamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Patentes como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Cirurgia Torácica/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Propriedade Intelectual , Licenciamento/economia , Cirurgia Torácica/economia , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...